What's To Like About the Crosstown Development?
- Multi-Use with residential: "'the design intent is to provide a pedestrian friendly center that permits apartments/condominiums and office above retail shops and on mass transit lines.'" Seeding the market and place with residents and a 24 hour life will increase the chances for real success.
- An Urban design: "parking on top of retail or office buildings and buildings that are built very close to the street. The plan also features parking buildings and on-street parking, which minimizes the need to build large surface parking lots, the bane of urban planners everywhere." And bloggers here.
- An Attack on Real Blight: Tax Increment Financing finds a worthy target.
- A Crossroads Location: In between Evergreen to the North and East, Central Gardens to the South and the diverse Medical Center neighborhoods to the west.
- The Possibility: a chance to visually, physically, socially connect a long fractured part of the city.
Update: in this Goner thread, the site is called the Washington Bottoms. Also in that thread, elle says " i hate the term "lifestyle center". it makes me wanna throw up in my mouth a little." I concur, then throw up. "Lifestyle center" sounds like a re-branded nursing home.
Labels: architecture, Crosstown, geo:lat=35.142439, geo:lon=-90.013665, geotagged, placemaking, real estate, redevelopment, Target, urban planning
6 Comments:
When are we likely to see real movement on this and not just talk?
Target stores don't have to be ugly boxes..if we demand a non-box..check out this link
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2005/08/16/BAGGPE8FR71.DTL&o=2
Physical and visual movement, I don't think the articles say.
But they appear to be a well-heeled firm, they own the land and they've started the land-use process with the Office of Planning and Development. There are drawings, but they haven't been published.
Compared to the fairgrounds, this thing is a rocket.
anonymous, it makes sense for a store that prides itself on value and design to build like that. In fact, Target's store on Winchester is kind of nice -- sleek modernism. It's that dagblasted surrounding sea of surface parking (built atop the grave of a clear-cut forest) that bothers me. If they or any other major retailer use urban/Midtown offsets with little exposed parking, and don't destroy greater buildings in the process, the design can be almost anything and I'll be happy (I think).
Hey Gates: Off the subject.
What's your thoughts on the Erickson proposal for the pyramid and Mud Island. I'll refrain for now but I would be curious to hear what you have to say.
Aaron, I'm writing something about the Pyramid plan. Hopefully have it up tomorrow or Friday.
The Daily News had this tease of a rendering on its cover today.
http://tinyurl.com/35pekw. Other than the scary ghost people it looks good.
Post a Comment
<< Home