Beauty == Utility
The only voice of opposition at the Land Use Control Board's affirmative vote on the Unified Development Code a few weeks ago came from Memphis Light Gas & Water.The utility had a problem with several sections of the code, especially
A. New electric utility services shall be placed underground where functionally feasible...(section 5.3.4)
I seem to remember the MLG&W rep stating that the aesthetics of the code would be a drag on functionality for utilities. A utility's utilitarian argument.
Yet the mass disruptions whipped up by last weekend's storms (mostly by trees and branches falling on above-grade power lines) and the historic storm data exposed by this NOAA map (hat tip Naomi)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b363b/b363b8c6b592c13e612631cc2b11ab0971b18eff" alt=""
Good aesthetics in tree-rich, storm-happy Memphis is good utility.
Labels: Memphis, Memphis Light Gas and Water, trees, Unified Development Code, urban design, urban planning